Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric Vanshelboim vs Fons Van Sambeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vanshelboim vs Sambeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric Vanshelboim vs Fons Van Sambeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vanshelboim 0 - 0 Sambeek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vanshelboim has won 46.46% of points on their second serve, while Sambeek has won 35.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vanshelboim, in recent form, has won 54.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sambeek has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.23% and 26.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vanshelboim has saved 53.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sambeek has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vanshelboim has won 61.33% of matches played (W/L 46/ 29), with Sambeek winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vanshelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 158/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4). Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Vanshelboim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.45% of matches (W/L 36/ 19), where as Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vanshelboim has played against opponents with an average rank of 176.36 while Sambeek has played against players with an average rank of 111.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vanshelboim has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sambeek has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vanshelboim has converted 46.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sambeek has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
466
Rank
357
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
65% (209-112)
Career Total W/L
53% (35-31)
56% (22-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Eric Vanshelboim vs Fons Van Sambeek For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vanshelboim VS Sambeek
Sportsbook
Offer
Vanshelboim VS Sambeek H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric Vanshelboim | Fons Van Sambeek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (22/17) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (410/386) | 35% (7/13) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 119 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 164.21 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1798/2588) | 78% (50/64) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (1130/1798) | 56% (28/50) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (367/790) | 36% (5/14) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (141/302) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1146/2638) | 38% (26/69) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (22/37) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (18/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (18/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (21/5) | 0% (1/0) |
Eric Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Elmer Moller
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
11 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
39
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Carl Emil Overbeck
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Maxence Beauge
79%
(
92 of
116)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
117)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
118
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Charlie Camus
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Felipe Pinzon Moreno
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olle Wallin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vanshelboim Vs Sambeek Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vanshelboim are available here and Sambeek photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
